Following on the
heels of my last post and specifically my childhood dismay at discovering Lassie
was actually portrayed by a series of male dog actors, I suggest the re-gendering
of neutered dogs as a fascinating human-animal, conflict-related, anthrozoology
research topic. The pet dog is a unique boundary category that often serves as
a blank canvas upon which human owners assign meaning and expectation,
sometimes in conflict with the biological reality of the species. The conflict
aspect of neutering, and later reassigning stereotyped gender, to pet dogs may
not seem immediately apparent; dogs have no “say” in whether or not they will
be de-sexed, or re-sexed, for the sake of more harmonious cohabitation amongst
humans. One might argue dogs are not cognizant of the neutering procedure or
its after effects; and I am not arguing for pet dogs to suddenly be liberated
or allowed to run amuck in intact sexual abandon. What I am interested in is
human perceptions of, and responses to, dog sexes both before and after
surgical sterilization.
Launching off my
daughter/ research partner Monica’s areas of research interest, I find it curious
that people purchase dogs as commodified animals, but then immediately after
their purchases many elevate their pets to the social status of beloved,
gendered, family members, even claiming to view them as surrogate male or
female “fur-kids.” As these pet-owner identified canine “children” reach their teen years and
begin showing signs of puberty or sexual maturity, their "personhood"
may again be temporarily suspended—at least long enough for their owners to
have them surgically altered.
In my
professional experience as a dog behavioral trainer, elective surgical
neutering of companion dogs is generally argued to be warranted as an act of
population control; however it also seems to frequently be motivated by
peoples' expectations for post-operative behavioral changes. My clients have
cited anticipation of neutering-mitigated behavioral changes including
reductions in perceived sexually driven behaviors such as “urine marking,”
"roaming," “aggression,” "humping," and
"spotting" (from females in estrus.)
Once dogs have
been "neutered," many pet owners reassign the status of gendered
personhood to their pets, evidenced by purchases of stereotypical male and
female dog "clothing" and equipment in either frilly, sparkly,
prissy, "feminine"--or bold, clean-lined, "masculine"--colors,
prints and designs. One of the more extreme products available for the regendering
of neutered male dogs is "Neuticles"--prosthetic testicles for
post-castration implantation in vacated dog scrotums. I am not making this up.
I would like to
conduct research specific to peoples’ perceptions of dog sexes and behavioral
expectations both before and after surgical sterilization. My hope is that this
research might include interviews with pet owners who have had their dogs
implanted with a set of Neuticles, to explore whether quality of life is improved
for either the masculinity-enhanced dog or his human family members.
If any of my
imaginary readers would like to join Monica and me in this research, or if any
bored Anthrozoology professors would like to sign up to mentor us and guide our
homeschool grad school research, please get in touch!
I'm super interested in this topic as well (duh.) I'd just like to add that there is a definite element of neotenization inherent in the process of removing hormonal and sexual abilities of pet dogs. It keeps them fur children, rather than actual persons, with those inconvenient and uncomfortable urges associated with adult canid behavior.
ReplyDelete